<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8" standalone="yes"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"><channel><title>XAML on madd0's tech blog</title><link>/tags/xaml/</link><description>Recent content in XAML on madd0's tech blog</description><generator>Hugo -- gohugo.io</generator><language>en-us</language><lastBuildDate>Sun, 07 Oct 2007 08:27:06 +0000</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="/tags/xaml/index.xml" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/><item><title>Define "seamless"...</title><link>/2007/10/07/define-quotseamlessquot/</link><pubDate>Sun, 07 Oct 2007 08:27:06 +0000</pubDate><guid>/2007/10/07/define-quotseamlessquot/</guid><description>(Disclaimer: although I&amp;rsquo;m all for constructive criticism most of the time, this is clearly nothing more than a rant, which by the way, does not even deserve translating.)
Lets start with a dictionary definition of the word seamless:
adjective. perfectly consistent and coherent
Now lets take a look at a quote from the website of a product I decided to work with while writing my book on WPF (highlight mine):</description></item></channel></rss>